E-Bikes: Changing the Way We Move

It is widely acknowledged that e-bikes are no longer considered a novelty. Once viewed as a niche product for enthusiasts, they have now become a popular mode of transportation for commuting, grocery shopping, or simply getting around without relying on a car. E-bikes make cycling more accessible to a wider range of people, including parents carrying children, commuters avoiding traffic, and older individuals staying active.

In essence, e-bikes are revolutionizing the way people travel all around the globe.

However, not all e-bikes are made equal. The market has been inundated with inexpensive, uncertified imports that often compromise on safety and performance. On the other hand, there are companies like Riese & Müller, a German brand renowned for producing some of the most dependable and innovative e-bikes available. They utilize high-quality components, prioritize sustainability by using aluminum and recycled aluminum frames, and provide strong dealer networks to support their products. If you are looking for an e-bike that is durable and safe, this is the brand to consider.

Unfortunately, the story takes a frustrating turn. Riese & Müller recently informed US retailers that they are halting shipments due to new import regulations. Under Section 232, steel products from most countries are now subject to a 50% tariff. Even though R&M constructs its frames from aluminum, their bikes still contain small steel parts like axles and bolts. Customs does not make exceptions, resulting in the entire bike being taxed. For a $7,000 e-bike, this could mean an additional $3,500 added at the border.

This situation is incredibly nonsensical. The rule was intended to safeguard US steel production, but instead, it penalizes companies that produce sustainable products aimed at reducing car usage and emissions. Consumers end up paying more, retailers face uncertainty, and brands like R&M, which invest in quality and safety, are forced to take a step back while subpar imports flood the market. This is detrimental to the environment, public health, and anyone seeking affordable and accessible transportation alternatives.

There are more effective ways to address this issue. The government could classify e-bikes separately, recognizing that the steel content is minimal compared to the overall product. Tariffs could be directed towards raw steel or high-volume industries, rather than mobility products that happen to include a few steel components. This approach would protect domestic steel manufacturers without hindering an industry that contributes to reducing traffic congestion and carbon emissions, while making transportation more convenient for everyone.

Obtaining an e-bike has now become significantly more challenging. If you were considering purchasing an e-bike to replace short car trips, your choices have become limited and more costly. This issue extends beyond Riese & Müller, affecting other reputable brands such as Brompton and Yuba. The outcome is fewer quality options and higher prices, making it more difficult for ordinary individuals to transition to two-wheeled transportation.

If we are serious about promoting healthier modes of transportation and creating more sustainable cities, the last thing we should be doing is imposing tariffs on the e-bikes that are actually making a difference. Yet, here we are.